Editorial Policy

This site runs on four editorial principles. First, we only review a brand after at least one editor has signed up with a test account, tried a deposit, and confirmed the published promo code with their own eyes. Second, we quote the operator's own public terms word for word and link to the exact page where we read them — a reader should always be able to re-check our claim at the source. Third, we date every review on the page and refresh it when terms change. Fourth, we never move a score higher because of commercial pressure; the operator does not see a review before it is published and does not approve it afterwards.

The site earns a small commission on new accounts referred to the CampoBet operator and to a short list of competitors covered for comparison. The commercial relationship is strictly a signup bounty: there is no payment for a positive review, no payment for a higher score, and no editorial control from the operator over any page on this site. If an operator asks for a correction, we treat the request like any reader email — we check the fact, update the page if the request is correct, and publish a note about the change in the Corrections section. We decline paid placements and paid banners that would compromise independence.

Each page on this site is reviewed at least once per quarter and whenever the operator announces a change to a bonus, a payment method, or a licence. A changed figure — maximum bonus, wagering requirement, minimum deposit — is updated the same working week the operator posts the change. The date at the top of each review reflects the latest refresh, not the original publication date. Pages that fall out of date are removed from the home page and the sitemap and either rewritten or archived; we do not leave stale reviews on the live site under newer dates.

Our editors work from three types of source. The operator's own live pages, read at the moment of writing and quoted directly where it matters — these are the most authoritative source for current terms. Independent player forums with a long history of operator reviews, used for signal on payout speed and support quality rather than for terms. And public regulator records — licence number, licence status, jurisdiction — used to verify that the operator is actually authorised in the markets we claim it serves. We do not use anonymous tip-offs as the sole source for a factual claim.

Every number that lands on the site goes through two pairs of eyes: the editor who wrote the page, and a second editor who re-reads the operator's live page and confirms each figure. Promo codes are tested on a real test account and a screenshot of the credited bonus is kept in our internal archive. If a reader writes to editorial@campox.org to report a stale figure, we re-check within two working days and update the page within a week. Corrections that materially change a score are noted at the bottom of the page with the date and nature of the change.